<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>zeroturnaround.com &#187; Maven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zeroturnaround.com/tag/maven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zeroturnaround.com</link>
	<description>Improving Java Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Build Tool Report: Turnaround Times using Ant, Maven, Eclipse, IntelliJ, and NetBeans</title>
		<link>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/the-build-tool-report-turnaround-times-using-ant-maven-eclipse-intellij-and-netbeans/</link>
		<comments>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/the-build-tool-report-turnaround-times-using-ant-maven-eclipse-intellij-and-netbeans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jevgeni Kabanov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Build Tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntelliJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JRebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetBeans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeroturnaround.com/?p=1837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time ago we ran a survey asking a few questions about the build process, specifically the tools that are used to do incremental builds and how much time those builds take. We had over 600 responses, so now it’s time to count the results. This is the first time that we’ve published results on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/the-build-tool-report-turnaround-times-using-ant-maven-eclipse-intellij-and-netbeans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ant vs Maven vs Eclipse, IntelliJ, NetBeans &#8211; Exploring Incremental Builds</title>
		<link>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/ant-vs-maven-vs-eclipse-intellij-netbeans-exploring-incremental-builds/</link>
		<comments>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/ant-vs-maven-vs-eclipse-intellij-netbeans-exploring-incremental-builds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Booth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incremental build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntelliJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetBeans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeroturnaround.com/?p=1534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’re looking into incremental builds &#8212; trying to document the differences in popularity &#38; productivity between using tools like Ant and Maven versus IDEs.  We haven’t seen a study like this before, so thanks for taking a minute to fill this out.  If you’re interested in winning a free license of JRebel (formerly JavaRebel), include [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/ant-vs-maven-vs-eclipse-intellij-netbeans-exploring-incremental-builds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

