<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>zeroturnaround.com &#187; IntelliJ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zeroturnaround.com/tag/intellij/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zeroturnaround.com</link>
	<description>Improving Java Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New JRebel Plugin for IntelliJ IDEA 11.1 released</title>
		<link>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/jrebel-plugin-for-intellijidea-11-1/</link>
		<comments>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/jrebel-plugin-for-intellijidea-11-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anton Arhipov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntelliJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java EE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Join the Rebellion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JRebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new release]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zeroturnaround.com/?p=10098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not like you would hear it from us first, but IntelliJ IDEA 11.1 was recently released and we&#8217;ve released a new plugin for JRebel to match it: http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?id=4441 Ok, why do I need a new JRebel plugin? The new version of IntelliJ IDEA has incompatible changes in the debugger API (http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-81452). It’s important for us that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/jrebel-plugin-for-intellijidea-11-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free version of JRebel released with JRebel 4.5</title>
		<link>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/free-version-of-jrebel-social/</link>
		<comments>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/free-version-of-jrebel-social/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Booth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avoid redeploys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise java app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntelliJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java EE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javarebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Join the Rebellion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JRebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JRebel Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MyEclipse IDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetBeans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ninja tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no redeploys using JRebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spring framework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop redeploying forever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeroturnaround]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeroturnaround.com/?p=7455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet That’s pretty big news.  JRebel for free? Now, you may be thinking, &#8220;But how can a company that survives off of their JRebel revenue (and employs &#62;25 people) release a free version of the productivity tool? It even won a bunch of awards (JOLT Productivity Award, JAX 2011 Most Innovative Java Technology, Estonian Innovation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/free-version-of-jrebel-social/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Build Tool Report: Turnaround Times using Ant, Maven, Eclipse, IntelliJ, and NetBeans</title>
		<link>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/the-build-tool-report-turnaround-times-using-ant-maven-eclipse-intellij-and-netbeans/</link>
		<comments>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/the-build-tool-report-turnaround-times-using-ant-maven-eclipse-intellij-and-netbeans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jevgeni Kabanov</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Build Tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntelliJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JRebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetBeans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeroturnaround.com/?p=1837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time ago we ran a survey asking a few questions about the build process, specifically the tools that are used to do incremental builds and how much time those builds take. We had over 600 responses, so now it’s time to count the results. This is the first time that we’ve published results on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/the-build-tool-report-turnaround-times-using-ant-maven-eclipse-intellij-and-netbeans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ant vs Maven vs Eclipse, IntelliJ, NetBeans &#8211; Exploring Incremental Builds</title>
		<link>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/ant-vs-maven-vs-eclipse-intellij-netbeans-exploring-incremental-builds/</link>
		<comments>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/ant-vs-maven-vs-eclipse-intellij-netbeans-exploring-incremental-builds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Booth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incremental build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IntelliJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetBeans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeroturnaround.com/?p=1534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’re looking into incremental builds &#8212; trying to document the differences in popularity &#38; productivity between using tools like Ant and Maven versus IDEs.  We haven’t seen a study like this before, so thanks for taking a minute to fill this out.  If you’re interested in winning a free license of JRebel (formerly JavaRebel), include [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://zeroturnaround.com/blog/ant-vs-maven-vs-eclipse-intellij-netbeans-exploring-incremental-builds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

